Email Address:

Sign up for daily email digests. Close this box

Stories that matter

Slideshow: Mark Laita’s Created Equal

Lingerie Model/Woman in Girdle, 2006/2007, Photo: Mark Laita

You’ve probably seen Mark Laita’s commercial photography – the cherry red Mini Cooper, glossy iPad, and ever so drinkable bottle of Johnnie Walker Blue – but you might not guess the same photographer is behind Created Equal, a provocative series of diptychs portraying Americans from all walks of life.

Brett Myers: This work seems so different from all your other photography, both commercial and personal. How did this project come about and why did you want to work on it?

Mark Laita: Created Equal is different from my other work in that it’s not politically correct. Perhaps it’s a reaction to all the years of working for advertising clients, producing work that was pleasing to look at. Almost all commercial work has a committee or focus group making certain that the end result is “nice.” I felt the need to produce something that was raw and real, as life truly is, not just what we aspire to.

The more shocking to our sense of what’s “right,” the better. That’s why I sought out the worst pedophile I could find (with a list of the most horrible convictions you can imagine) and a beautiful and innocent little girl (photographed with her mother’s consent of the pairing of images). If the viewer cringes from the pairing that’s great. I think a lot of us don’t think what you see in Created Equal exists in our city, but take a look at your neighborhood’s Megan’s list website sometime and tell me how “nice” your town is. Every city in the U.S. has sex offenders, prostitutes, drug addicts along with wonderful humanitarians, philanthropists and leaders. I aimed to depict our country as it is, not as we would like to think it is.

BAM: How do you choose which images to pair, and are there times when you have trouble deciding between multiple different pairings, all of which might completely change the meaning of the photograph?

ML: Absolutely. There were many diptychs that were switched several times, which of course changes what the viewer sees and thinks. They’re almost all interchangeable.

BAM: My first thought was that this work reminds me a bit of August Sanders’ photographs documenting different types of people (e.g. The Farmer, The Skilled Tradesman, etc). Obviously there are also many differences between your work and his — probably the biggest one being the amount of judgment you place on your subjects. Can you tell me about the kinds of negotiations you have, either with your subjects, or your own conscience about the types of comparisons you draw and the context you place on the people who sit for you?

ML: As I see people I’m amazed at how circumstances, fate or our environment directs us into whom we have become. I am fascinated at how, in America, one young girl grows up to be a catholic nun and another grows up to be a prostitute. What kind of things happened to her as a child? Is she happy? Is she a contributing member of society? These are my concerns. What judgment am I making by showing these two images together? Does this not actually happen in our country? Created Equal simply shows real examples of these ironic twists of fate. I find people fascinating and these diptychs help to get your mind turning.

As for my conscience about my role in these pairings, I know I have depicted each person as they were on that day. They stood for my camera knowing that image might appear in a book. The fact that an African-American Baptist churchgoer appears next to a white supremacist doesn’t change who she is or what she stands for. I believe in fact it reinforces it. The same goes for the white supremacist. While I know many of my subjects would have declined had they known up front what I had planned to do with their portrait, I have shown the pairings to several of the most “uncomfortable” ones and the subjects ultimately loved it.

BAM: When I saw your Bull Rider/Rock Musician diptych, I chuckled because I’ve never drawn comparisons between those two professions before. Yet beyond the obvious, leather pants, there’s a hyper-masculinity and even a certain ideal of what it means to be a cowboy or a rock star, which can sometimes look a bit like a costume. I like that you force people to think about what it is you’re suggesting, but sometimes I am really uncomfortable with your suggestions. For instance Woman in Bar/Gold Prospector. Are there any pieces which in retrospect, make you uncomfortable?

ML: Yes, of course! That’s the whole idea. If life doesn’t make you uncomfortable you’re not aware of what’s going on around you. Reality is harsh and these images aim to show that. So much photography we see now is heavily retouched and beautified to the extent that it’s no longer photography. It’s some sort of marketing monster we’ve spawned. Created Equal’s portraits are not always beautiful, but they’re real and honest, which is what I aimed for.

Each of these pairings means something different to each viewer. As for the two examples you’ve cited, the Bullrider/Rock Musician was, for me, about young men proving themselves in the world — two “dragon slayers” looking to make their mark in ways that are drastically different, due to their different cultures. While some of these pairings are very heavy and dark, many are stupid and fun. The Woman in Bar/Gold Prospector is about what people will do for money. A gold digger is a gold digger. Life can be painful and funny at the same time.

Related posts:

  1. Slideshow: Blind Prom
  2. Slideshow: Photographer Visits Father’s Former Internment Camp
  3. Slideshow: Old People In Bathing Suits
  4. Slideshow: Flat Daddy – Cardboard Cutouts of Soldier Dads
  5. Slideshow: Hot Guys and Baby Animals
  • Krutcha

    terrific work!

  • Anonymous

    These are powerful pairings. But, I wish he didn’t refer to the abortion provider as an”abortionist” and the street prostitute as a “crack whore.” Perhaps someone whose primarily mode of expression is photography/images doesn’t understand the power the language and naming. These terms feel uncomfortably derogatory to me.

  • http://DeadAmericanDream.blogspot.com AngryBroomstick

    “Crack Whore” Really? Did she have any idea that you exploited her photo and called her a crack whore? A more respectful term should have been used to describe her. Geez.

    Other than that, this was a very cool photo series.

  • Dianabanana

    Wow…don’t you people get it? You are supposed to be offended and boo hoo for you if you don’t like it. Please re-read what this is all about and get over your self righteous indignation.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1609210133 Jess Ica

    Maybe the “crack whore” referred to herself as such, or maybe she prostitutes for drugs as payment, so what other label should be posted? Maybe the whole intent is to be provocative and get us to talk. ;) Either way, very very powerful series! Thank you for sharing!

  • Anonymous

    To the two of you complaining about naming conventions, why didn’t you zone in on White Supremacist? That’s just as demeaning and inflammatory. No one cares about how you feel about these terms used, it’s not your slideshow.

  • tbone

    They should only be derogatory if you are a crack whore or Abortionist, and if you are nobody cares how you feel.

  • Ieatbees

    That was a she?

  • Ieatbees

    That was a she?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Patty-Morgan/1191648129 Patty Morgan

    This is really interesting about makes you look at images differently.

  • student

    By juxtaposing the “crack whore” and the “escort” the photographer manages to demonstrate striking similarities. The visual undermines the connotations and conventions that we normally associate with those linguistic titles.

  • Anonymous

    You seem to completely miss the opinion the photographer was trying to convey through these photographs. He is trying to fight the anodyne effect of political correctness with saying it as it is. If that lady performs sexual favors in return for drug money, a crack whore is what she is. It’s a raw descriptive term instead something stupid and fake romantic like ‘lady of the night’.

  • Pamaranthe

    There’s alot of “food for thought” here& a welcome vacation,actually.That’s why i love art:it can heal,soothe,outrage,:distract , uplift & sometimes carry the mind on a merry romp down the rabbithole.

  • sarajo

    Already typed it.Ain’ gonna type it again.Inspiration is a butterfy.when she’s flown,she’s flown..Suffice tosay,I love black & white as it reveals everycrack & crevice.Art transports u somewhere,whether u like it or not..The way these photos are juxtaposed is quite revealing,about the artist as well as the subject matter.,

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Denis-Wiench/100001403414073 Denis Wiench

    sweet

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_S4A7VAOYOOQWY3VCIDBEOYPNPA autodidactic: mad information

    I would care about the abortionist if he were providing my abortion.

    I would care about that crack whore if she were my sister.

  • shari

    This is so awesome.  I loved it.  thanks for sharing.

  • Jacquerius

    The sunbather’s body is intense. A human barrel.

  • Notyourmama

    There is no such word as “Abortionist”. The correct term is doctor.

  • Recon721

    How far is that stick up your ass?

blog comments powered by Disqus